Elisha Ongoya has played a crucial role in Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s legal defense during his impeachment trial in the Senate.

During his submission in the Senate, he argued that the impeachment motion lacks substantial evidence and is fundamentally flawed, labeling it as “the most embarrassing motion ever approved by a house of Parliament”.

His contributions are vital as Gachagua seeks to rally support among senators to counter the impeachment charges.

Career

Ongoya serves as the Senior Lecturer in the Department of Private Law at Kabarak University Law School.

He is recognized for his extensive contributions to legal education and practice, particularly in private law.

Additionally, Ongoya has been involved in several high-profile impeachment cases that have garnered significant attention in Kenya.

One notable case is that of Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza, where he served as lead counsel.

In this case, Ongoya argued that the charges against Mwangaza were frivolous and constituted an abuse of the impeachment powers held by the County Assembly.

His defense emphasized the need for accountability and fairness in the impeachment process.

Additionally, Ongoya is part of the defense team for Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, who faces accusations of gross constitutional violations.

In this case, his team raised objections regarding potential conflicts of interest involving opposing counsel, further showcasing his expertise and commitment to upholding legal standards in high-stakes situations.

Notable cases

Ongoya has argued several notable cases throughout his career.

One significant case is Jackson Kipkemboi Koskey & 7 others v Samuel Muriithi Njogu & 4 others, where he was found guilty of contempt of court, leading to a ruling that resulted in his and Reverend Kosgey’s committal to prison for a month due to their refusal to disqualify themselves from proceedings.

Another important case is National Transport and Safety Authority v Elisha Z. Ongoya & 2 others, where Ongoya was the first respondent in a civil appeal concerning damages awarded against the Authority.

The High Court ruled against the application filed by the Authority, reinforcing Ongoya’s position in the case.